State v. Royal
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 4146
Syllabus
COUNSEL - CRIM.R. 32.1 - PLEAS: Defense counsel's mere inaccurate prediction of defendant's sentence did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's postsentence Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw his guilty pleas where manifest injustice did not result from defense counsel's erroneous sentence prediction and where the record supports a finding that defendant's guilty pleas were voluntarily and intelligently made.
Judges: Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- Ohio v. VinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-03· cited 66×
- State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-19· cited 11×
- State v. FellerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-21· cited 6×
- State v. AlsipOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.