Supreme Court of Vermont· 6/12/2002
State v. Roya
Citations
- 807 A.2d 371
- 174 Vt. 451
- 2002 Vt. LEXIS 142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining rule that defendant must introduce some evidence of prejudice to warrant suppression of test result
- requiring defendant to demonstrate a “causal connection” between misinformation and refusal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PollanderSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-12-05· cited 42×
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 38×
- Pfeil v. Rutland District CourtSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-08-01· cited 35×
- State v. DuffSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-11-03· cited 32×
- State v. DevineSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-05-22· cited 17×
- State v. MadonnaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-02-19· cited 15×
- State v. GraceySupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-09-01· cited 13×
- State v. LynaughSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-01-17· cited 12×
- State v. HammSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-18· cited 12×
- State v. RoyaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-04-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.