State v. Roy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff could claim “only those payments coming due . . . within the six-year period of limitations . . . ”
• \A contract signed because a party is bargaining under adverse conditions or in pressing want ofpecuniary means is not unenforceable on account of duress ifthe other party is not responsible for those circumstances and did not create those necessities\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Roy
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-12-21· cited 8×
• Contour Design v. Chance Mold Steel
  D. New Hampshire· 2011-04-25· cited 4×
• Pierce v. Metropolitan Life I n s . C o .
  D. New Hampshire· 2004-03-05
• Steven Aubertin v. Fairbanks Capital
  D. New Hampshire· 2005-02-11
• Seasons at Attitash v. Country Gas
  D. New Hampshire· 1997-09-12
• Clark v. Mitchell
  D. New Hampshire· 1996-07-02
• Gidley et al. v. Oliveri
  D. New Hampshire· 2009-06-25
• Gans v. Gant
  D. New Hampshire· 2013-07-03
• Roy v. NH DOC, et al.
  D. New Hampshire· 2012-01-25
• Carnival Fruit v. Grewal
  D. New Hampshire· 2006-01-31

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Allard
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1976-04-30· cited 10×
• St. Pierre v. Vitek
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-11-29· cited 9×