State v. Rowley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that after limitations period had passed, state could not amend information that charged conspiracy to cheat and defraud and add new count

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Crump v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1888-05-24· cited 33×
• State v. Smith
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1847-11-24· cited 14×
• United States v. Rintelen
  S.D. New York· 1916-06-29· cited 7×
• Scott v. People
  New York Supreme Court· 1872-03-05· cited 4×
• Orr v. People
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1896-03-31· cited 3×
• Crump v. Commonwealth
  New York Supreme Court· 1888-05-15
• A. Ames & Co. v. Wallace
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1933-07-01

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Drake v. Watson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1809-06-15· cited 2×