State v. Rowland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Blakely does not apply on remand when the trial court does not disturb factual findings or increase the defendant's sentence
• holding Blakely does not apply on remand when the trial court does not disturb factual findings or increase the defendant's sentence
• “The trial court on remand did not redecide the justification for the exceptional sentence, and the change to Rowland's standard range left the justification intact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lowy v. PeaceHealth
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 75×
• State v. Parmelee
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-01-22· cited 10×
• State v. Bailon Wences
  Washington Supreme Court· 2017-11-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• State v. Evans
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 128×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Rowland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-04-06· cited 17×
• In Re Personal Restraint of Rowland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-04-06· cited 16×
• State v. Rowland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-02-28· cited 12×
• State v. Rowland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-17· cited 7×