Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/26/1952

State v. Rowland

Citations

239 P.2d 949
172 Kan. 224
30 A.L.R. 2d 455
1952 Kan. LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that where the State seeks and the district judge approves a dismissal without prejudice of the prior case, the procedure does not “prejudice a fresh prosecution on a new information charging Ae identical offense set forth in Ae prior information”
finding that where the State seeks and the district judge approves a dismissal without prejudice of the prior case, the procedure does not \prejudice a fresh prosecution on a new information charging the identical offense set forth in the prior information\
\[T]he entering of a nolle prosequi with consent of the trial court did not prejudice a fresh prosecution on a new information charging the identical offense set forth in the prior information.\
\[T]his court long ago decided that the entering of a nolle prosequi with consent of the trial court did not prejudice a fresh prosecution on a new information charging the identical offense set forth in the prior information.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thiele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.