Skip to main content

State v. Rowe

Citations

  • 285 S.W.3d 614
  • 374 Ark. 19
  • 2008 Ark. LEXIS 415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court cannot rule a statute unconstitutional post-conviction via nunc pro tunc because it is “an attempt to have the record reflect what should have happened and not what happened but was not recorded”
  • explaining that a challenge to the constitutionality of Act 1782 was not a challenge to defendant’s conviction or sentence but instead addressed the collateral issue of parole eligibility
  • supplementing the criminal rules with Rule 60 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.