Nebraska Supreme Court· 5/27/1988

State v. Rowe

Citations

423 N.W.2d 782
228 Neb. 663
1988 Neb. LEXIS 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining, as possible basis for peremptory challenge, value of observing prospective jurors’ demeanor during voir dire
upholding the removal of a prospective juror on the basis that she was a “Job Service employee ... engaged in a form of social work” and also that she was friendlier during defense counsel’s questioning of prospective jurors than she was during the State’s questioning
to make a prima facie case under Batson, criminal defendant must show (1) she or he is a member of a cognizable racial group, (2) prosecutor used peremptory challenges to remove members of defendant’s race from venire, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.