State v. Roubique

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Private Road, No Trespassing” sign at driveway’s entrance was “ample evidence of [the defendant’s] intent to preserve his privacy” and that officer’s entry onto the defendant’s property violated the Fourth Amendment
• holding that “Private Road, No Trespassing” sign at driveway‟s entrance was “ample evidence of [the defendant‟s] intent to preserve his privacy” and that officer‟s entry onto the defendant‟s property violated the Fourth Amendment
• finding a “Private Road, No Trespassing” sign at the entrance to the driveway was ample evidence of the resident’s intent to preserve his privacy
• finding a ―Private Road, No Trespassing‖ sign at the entrance to the driveway was ample evidence of the resident‘s intent to preserve his privacy
• reasonable expectation of privacy when no-trespassing signs posted by private road and isolated trailer \barely visible from the road\
• no-trespassing sign posted at entrance of driveway

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).