State v. Rotar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he doctrine of contra preferentum [invites courts] to interpret .. . ambiguities against the drafter of the contract... .”
• “To the extent that the amicus brief is 19 interpreting the agency’s own regulations, as it is here, it is entitled to deference under Auer, 519 20 U.S. 452, as long as the regulation is ambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).