State v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court erred in ordering the defendant to pay court-appointed attorney fees under ORS 161.665(3) (1999) without making findings with respect to the defendant’s present ability to pay, as required by ORS 161.675(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Carey-Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-09-06· cited 14×
• State v. Flajole
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-02-15· cited 3×
• State v. Ashley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-16· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Edson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 44×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-13· cited 5×