State v. Rosen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 60-day rule under the Wisconsin controlled substances act is mandatory and that failure to set the hearing within that period deprived the trial court of jurisdiction
• holding that the 60-day rule under the Wisconsin controlled substances act is mandatory and that failure to set the hearing within that period deprived the trial court of jurisdiction
• interpreting Wis. Stat. § 161.555(2)(b) (1973-74), which provided that \the action [brought to cause the forfeiture of property seized under Wis. Stat. § 161.55 (1973-74)] shall be set for hearing within 60 days of the service of the answer\
• applying a predecessor provision identical, as material, to § 961.555(2) (b)
• right to object to loss of jurisdiction for failure to hold hearing within 60-day statutory period cannot be waived
• right to object to loss of jurisdiction for failure to hold hearing within 60-day statutory period cannot be waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).