State v. Rose
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1845
Syllabus
Batson Claim. Defendant-appellant's counsel's failure to respond to the government's race-neutral explanation for exercising its preemptory strike indicated he no longer disputed the strike. Even assuming defendant-appellant still disputed the strike, the trial court's ruling was not clearly erroneous the record does not support finding that the State was motivated in substantial part by discriminatory intent.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
- Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2008-03-19· cited 1,296×
- Foster v. ChatmanSupreme Court· 2016-05-23· cited 461×
- Flowers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 2019-06-21· cited 355×
- State v. Thompson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-29· cited 240×
- State v. BryanOhio Supreme Court· 2004-03-17· cited 225×
- State v. GowdyOhio Supreme Court· 2000-04-28· cited 159×
- People v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-27· cited 18×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18· cited 3×
- State v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-19· cited 3×
- State v. KirkOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.