Skip to main content

State v. Rose

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 1845

Syllabus

Batson Claim. Defendant-appellant's counsel's failure to respond to the government's race-neutral explanation for exercising its preemptory strike indicated he no longer disputed the strike. Even assuming defendant-appellant still disputed the strike, the trial court's ruling was not clearly erroneous the record does not support finding that the State was motivated in substantial part by discriminatory intent.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.