Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 3/11/1993
State v. Rose
Citations
- 622 A.2d 78
- 1993 Me. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining to the jury, after defense counsel objected to the prosecutor's improper tailoring questions asked of the defendant on cross examination, that the defendant had \an absolute legal right afforded all defendants by law ... to be present through the entire trial\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Clifford, Collins, Rudman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-12-14· cited 139×
- State v. MattsonHawaii Supreme Court· 2010-03-18· cited 27×
- State v. WalshHawaii Supreme Court· 2011-08-23· cited 25×
- State v. EastmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-03-12· cited 23×
- State v. YoungSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-07-25· cited 7×
- State v. WinchenbachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-05-26· cited 7×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.