State v. Rosales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Rule 32.1(f) applies when a defendant intends to timely appeal but fails to do so because of attorney error
• finding that movant’s previous motion did not preclude him from attacking his sentencing because it did not provide an opportunity for him to raise the claims he brings now

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Manning v. State
  Utah Supreme Court· 2005-09-23· cited 61×
• State v. Petty
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-31· cited 47×
• State of Arizona v. Phillip Gregory Speers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-11-02· cited 8×
• State of Arizona v. Glen Leo Gagnon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-12-03· cited 4×
• State of Arizona v. Samuel Phillip Viramontes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-08-26· cited 3×
• State of Arizona v. Darren Irving Goldin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-12-22· cited 3×
• State of Arizona v. Richard Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-03-31
• State of Arizona v. James N. Petty
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-31
• Jacob T. Osterkamp v. State of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-02-25
• State v. Jones
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2016-12-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Watton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-06-07· cited 73×
• Stewart v. Smith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2002-05-30· cited 70×
• State v. Herrera
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-10-17· cited 61×
• State v. Robles
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-25· cited 35×
• State v. Berry
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-06-22· cited 23×
• Application of Acosta
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-03-25· cited 7×