Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/9/2005
State v. Root
Citations
- 123 P.3d 281
- 202 Or. App. 491
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the voters used different verb tenses intentionally to indicate different relative points in time” within the same statute
- concluding that, to use the affirmative defense of medical marijuana, the defendant’s “attending physician’s advice regarding the use of medical marijuana had to occur before the incident for which he was arrested (emphasis added)
- using the PGE methodology as a “template” to construe ORS 475.319(1)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Deits
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-14· cited 7×
- Brownstone Homes Condominium Ass'n v. Brownstone Forest Heights, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-27· cited 4×
- People v. KolanekMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-01-11· cited 4×
- People v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-08-30· cited 4×
- State v. LusterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-28· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.