Skip to main content

State v. Root

Citations

  • 123 P.3d 281
  • 202 Or. App. 491
  • 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the voters used different verb tenses intentionally to indicate different relative points in time” within the same statute
  • concluding that, to use the affirmative defense of medical marijuana, the defendant’s “attending physician’s advice regarding the use of medical marijuana had to occur before the incident for which he was arrested (emphasis added)
  • using the PGE methodology as a “template” to construe ORS 475.319(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Deits

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.