State v. Rood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• charging instrument need not specify names of purchasers of lottery tickets in prosecution for sale of lottery tickets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lotches
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 125×
• State v. Nussbaum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-12-15· cited 37×
• State v. Shadley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-12-24· cited 34×
• State v. Nussbaum
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-07-29· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Langley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1958-03-19· cited 32×
• People v. Gelardi
  California Court of Appeal· 1946-12-31· cited 25×
• State v. Light
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1889-02-25· cited 22×
• People v. Faust
  California Supreme Court· 1896-06-05· cited 19×
• United States v. Sosseur
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1949-10-24· cited 5×
• State v. Hartung
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1918-12-13· cited 3×
• Goodman v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1883-11-15· cited 2×