State v. Romig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that indictment was sufficiently definite and certain where the defendant’s argument merely reiterated unsuccessful vagueness challenge
• “A criminal statute is unconstitutionally vague when it is not sufficiently definite to inform those who are subject to it what conduct on their part will render them liable to its sanctions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).