North Dakota Supreme Court· 4/9/2026

State v. Romanyshyn

Citations

2026 ND 73

Syllabus

When a motion to dismiss presents a pure question of law, it is not necessary for the district court to make factual findings to support its decision. Independent judicial research on a legal question does not implicate the judicial notice requirements of N.D.R.Ev. 201. Rule 201 is limited to judicial notice of adjudicative facts, not legal research.

Judges: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Dupree v. Younger
Supreme Court· 2023-05-25· cited 98×
State v. Graf
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-09-13· cited 57×
State v. Juntunen
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-04-29· cited 11×
State v. Zahn
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-01-11· cited 9×
State v. Canfield
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-12-19· cited 9×
State v. Zahn
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-02-25· cited 8×
State v. Kukert
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-10-28· cited 7×
State v. Kenny
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-08-22· cited 6×
Bogdan Radu v. Persephone Johnson Shon
Ninth Circuit· 2023-03-13· cited 5×
Lyons v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-02-08· cited 3×
Davis v. Romanyshyn
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-01-23· cited 2×
State v. Romanyshyn
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2026-02-26· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.