New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 5/10/1991
State v. Roman
Citations
- 590 A.2d 686
- 248 N.J. Super. 144
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that interpreting the age requirement to be the age at the time of trial “might encourage the defense to delay trial and hold the prosecutor captive to dilatory tactics”
- holding that the age requirement of former Evidence Rule 63(33) — admitting statements “by a child under the age of 12” — is “satisfied if the declarant was under 12 years of age when the statement was made” and that the child’s age at the time of trial “is irrelevant”
- where the Uniform Witness Act has been adopted by another state, it is not beyond the power of the trial court to compel appearance of a witness through the procedures of that Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Pressler, Baime and A.M. Stein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. P.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-06-07· cited 84×
- State v. J.G.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-01-06· cited 30×
- State v. D.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-02-09· cited 28×
- State ex rel. A.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2018-07-11· cited 22×
- State v. BurrNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-05-08· cited 17×
- State v. MabenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-06-23· cited 13×
- State v. MabenNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-08-03· cited 4×
- Reid Duard Hayes v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2020-09-18· cited 3×
- State v. PSSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-06-07
- State v. DGSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-02-09
- State v. JGNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-01-06
- Commonwealth v. GasdikMassachusetts Superior Court· 2004-11-10
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- State v. D.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-02-09· cited 95×
- State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-06-22· cited 15×
- State v. M.Z.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-03-15· cited 10×
- State v. HamiltonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-04-23· cited 9×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-07-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.