State v. Rollins
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4525
Syllabus
The trial court did not err when it overruled appellant's motion to vacate a void sentence because it was untimely filed and barred by res judicata. Furthermore, the record establishes that, even though the indictment stated an inapplicable specification pursuant to R.C. 2971.03(A)(4) with respect to Counts IV, V, and VII, the trial court, prior to sentencing and through an agreement of the parties, sentenced appellant under the applicable section, R.C. 2971.03(A)(3)(d)(ii). Thus, any error in the indictment was harmless. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.