State v. Rohfrischt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the so-called “exculpatory no” defense to false-statement prosecutions under Article 107
• rejecting the so-called \exculpatory no\ defense to false-statement prosecutions under Article 107
• “[P]olicy arguments . . . must be directed to Congress and the President for consideration, not to this Court.”
• “[P]olicy arguments . . . must be directed to Congress and the President for consideration, not to this Court.”
• no statutory language sanctions exculpatory no doctrine
• no statutory language sanctions exculpatory no doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).