State v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “evidence suggesting that defendant was involved in selling drugs also permits us to draw a reasonable inference that defendant was using the [vehicle] to store cocaine.”
• holding that “evidence suggesting that defendant was involved in selling drugs also permits us to draw a reasonable inference that defendant was using the [vehicle] to store cocaine.”
• determining the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate the defendant’s vehicle was “used for the keeping or selling of a controlled substance”
• discussing drugs and paraphernalia found in the gas cap compartment and in a boot in the vehicle, and a service receipt within the vehicle from two and a half months prior with defendant’s name on it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-03-19· cited 3×
• State v. Dudley
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-04-07
• State v. Blagg
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-05-05
• State v. Weldy
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-06-02
• State v. Blagg
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2021-06-11
• State v. Bradley
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-03-15
• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-05
• State v. Garmon
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-12-03
• In re L.L.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2024-12-13
• State v. Rowland
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-03-19
• Cottle v. Mankin
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2025-12-12
• State v. Hollis
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2026-03-04

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank
  Supreme Court· 1934-11-05· cited 435×
• State v. Rogers
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-02-07· cited 5×