Supreme Court of Florida· 11/22/1978
State v. Rodriquez
Citations
- 365 So. 2d 157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing section 409.325(2)(a) as incorporating federal food stamp law “in effect at the time Section 409.325(2)(a) was enacted”
- \It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that the entire statute under consideration must be considered in determining legislative intent.\
- to determine legislative intent, court will view entire statute
- entire statute must be considered in determining legislative intent
- entire statute must be considered in determining legislative intent
- entire statute must be considered in determining legislative intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alderman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Department of Law Enf. v. Real PropertySupreme Court of Florida· 1991-12-02· cited 162×
- State v. GillOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 58×
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-12-06· cited 49×
- Berek v. Metropolitan Dade Cty.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-03-24· cited 30×
- City of Pompano Beach v. CapalboDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-08· cited 28×
- Cuda v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-06-30· cited 23×
- State v. RobargeSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-17· cited 23×
- Prudential Ins. Co. v. BaitingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-26· cited 14×
- Lusker v. Guardianship of LuskerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-03· cited 13×
- State v. KliphouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-27· cited 12×
- Zerweck v. State Commission on EthicsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-06· cited 11×
- Piantadosi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-26· cited 10×
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-22· cited 9×
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-10-06· cited 8×
- Ebaugh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-10· cited 7×
- State v. RawlinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-27· cited 6×
- Beverly Enterprises-Florida, Inc. v. McVeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-21· cited 6×
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. MeddersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-03· cited 4×
- Wheaton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-07-27· cited 4×
- State v. SCM Glidco Organics Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-23· cited 4×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Reino v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-10-27· cited 102×
- State v. WershowSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-02-25· cited 76×
- Department of Legal Affairs v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-02-25· cited 56×
- D'ALEMBERTE v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-05-26· cited 45×
- Zachary v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-11-22· cited 39×
- Overstreet v. BlumSupreme Court of Florida· 1969-09-10· cited 30×
- Freimuth v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-12-20· cited 26×
- State v. HaylesSupreme Court of Florida· 1970-09-30· cited 21×
- Linville v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-05-18· cited 15×
- State v. CamilSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-06-20· cited 11×
- State v. KnowlesWashington Supreme Court· 1971-11-04· cited 10×
- State ex rel. Springer v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-09-02· cited 5×
- United States v. Ivan Ray GoyetteNinth Circuit· 1972-04-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.