Skip to main content
· 5/23/2007

State v. Rodriguez-Barrera

Citations

  • 159 P.3d 1201
  • 213 Or. App. 56
  • 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver it constitutes an attempted transfer within the meaning of [ORS 475.005(8)].” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • “If the wording of a statute is truly capable of one, and only one, reasonable construction then, whatever the legislative history may show, it cannot alter the unambiguous meaning of a statute.”
  • “If the wording of a statute is truly capable of one, and only one, reasonable construction then, whatever the legislative history may show, it cannot alter the unambiguous meaning of a statute.”
  • “[Possession of a controlled substance in a quantity that is inconsistent with personal use, when accompanied by possession of materials commonly associated with delivery, is sufficient to establish possession with intent to deliver the controlled substance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.