State v. Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking that approach where trial court erred by declining to make a finding that is necessary to an award of restitution
• remanding for trial court to address in the first instance the factual question of whether the victim’s economic damages were reasonably foreseeable
• vacating supplemental judgment requiring defendant to pay restitution and remanding for trial court to determine whether damage was reasonably foreseeable in the first instance, in light of Ramos

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Parsons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-23· cited 9×
• State v. Gutierrez-Medina
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-16· cited 2×
• State v. Xiu-Chable
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-24

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Jury
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-20· cited 149×
• State v. Ramos
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-02-19· cited 74×
• State v. Alonso
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-22· cited 12×