Skip to main content

State v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2295

Syllabus

The trial court's superfluous order to pay court-appointed-counsel fees is harmless error under Crim.R. 52(A). Nevertheless, the inclusion of that statement in the financial-obligations and recoupment section of the judgment entry of sentence is errant must be vacated. The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant. Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in part.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.