State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2295
Syllabus
The trial court's superfluous order to pay court-appointed-counsel fees is harmless error under Crim.R. 52(A). Nevertheless, the inclusion of that statement in the financial-obligations and recoupment section of the judgment entry of sentence is errant must be vacated. The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant. Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in part.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BallOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-09· cited 27×
- State v. CervantesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-25· cited 11×
- State v. AbstonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-21· cited 9×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-06· cited 5×
- State v. BoedickerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-29· cited 4×
- State v. FreemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-13· cited 3×
- State v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-01· cited 2×
- State v. HartlineOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-29· cited 2×
- State v. SandersOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-31
- State v. NelsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-03
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
- State v. Sergent (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-27· cited 162×
- State v. HackerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-26· cited 120×
- State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-01· cited 49×
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-22· cited 40×
- State v. StapletonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-09· cited 2×
- State v. MastonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.