State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 2020 ND 261
Syllabus
A defendant cannot successfully argue their waiver of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel was not voluntary, knowing, and intelligent when the record demonstrates the defendant's clear desire to represent himself despite an understanding of the risks therein. To challenge a conviction based on the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, a defendant must move for a judgment of acquittal under N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 at trial. This Court may not consider whether a district court obviously erred if an appellant fails to argue obvious error on appeal.
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-02-12· cited 53×
- State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-06-25· cited 52×
- State v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 50×
- City of Fargo v. RockwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-07-13· cited 34×
- State v. YinemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 28×
- State v. PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-04-28· cited 22×
- State v. SteenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-08-18· cited 22×
- State v. SheldonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-11-16· cited 19×
- State v. YostNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-11-12· cited 18×
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-10-03· cited 14×
- City of Fargo v. LundayNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-02-03· cited 10×
- State v. EstradaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-05-14· cited 9×
- City of Fargo v. LundayNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-09-25· cited 9×
- Discover Bank v. HornbacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-12-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.