State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 2987
Syllabus
Before imposing consecutive sentences, the trial court must find (1) that consecutive sentences are necessary to protect the public from future harm or punish the offender (2) that consecutive sentences are not disproportionate to the seriousness of the offender's conduct and the danger the offender poses to the public and (3) that one of the factors listed in R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(a-c) is applicable.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. BrookeOhio Supreme Court· 2007-04-18· cited 175×
- State v. NienbergOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-22· cited 63×
- State v. TaflingerOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-05· cited 31×
- State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-05· cited 17×
- State v. StairhimeOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-28· cited 10×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-08· cited 10×
- State v. StanislawOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.