Texas Supreme Court· 1/7/1999
State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 985 S.W.2d 83
- 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 318
- 1999 Tex. LEXIS 1
- 1999 WL 3572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a ninety-degree turn in a detour from a road construction project was not a special defect
- holding that a ninety-degree turn in a detour from a road construction project was not a special defect
- noting that a special defect is something that “unexpectedly and physically impair[s] a car’s ability to travel on the road”
- providing that even if sign placement decisions are discretionary, the State still waives immunity when the case involves a special defect
- finding that the design of highway and lack of barrier in median between north and southbound lanes reflected discretionary decisions for which TxDOT retained immunity
- holding design of detour was discretionary act for which immunity was not waived
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- County of Cameron v. BrownTexas Supreme Court· 2002-05-23· cited 1,421×
- Texas Department of Transportation v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court· 2002-06-06· cited 335×
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court· 2002-10-31· cited 313×
- Stephen F. Austin State University v. FlynnTexas Supreme Court· 2007-06-29· cited 142×
- City of Dallas v. ReedTexas Supreme Court· 2008-05-16· cited 91×
- Denton County v. BeynonTexas Supreme Court· 2009-05-01· cited 86×
- Texas Department of Transportation v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court· 2002-01-24· cited 84×
- Texas Department of Transportation v. YorkTexas Supreme Court· 2009-05-22· cited 76×
- Reyes v. City of LaredoTexas Supreme Court· 2010-12-03· cited 74×
- City of Mission v. CantuTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-11-21· cited 65×
- Perez v. City of DallasTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2005-12-13· cited 61×
- Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. PitonyakTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-07-25· cited 61×
- City of Denton v. Rachel PaperTexas Supreme Court· 2012-08-17· cited 56×
- Villegas v. Texas Department of TransportationTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-08-13· cited 50×
- City of Fort Worth v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-07-12· cited 44×
- Texas Department of Transportation v. PerchesTexas Supreme Court· 2012-11-16· cited 42×
- Texas Department of Transportation v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-06· cited 40×
- Tarrant Regional Water District v. Richard Johnson and Sharkara Johnson, Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Brandy JohnsonTexas Supreme Court· 2019-04-12· cited 38×
- Texas Department of Transportation v. BederkaTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2001-02-15· cited 37×
- Sanchez v. Matagorda CountyTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-12-18· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.