New Mexico Court of Appeals· 7/28/1992

State v. Rodriguez

Citations

837 P.2d 459
114 N.M. 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant’s absence from courtroom during child’s testimony to jury, instead of presenting videotape of child’s testimony to jury with defendant present, violated Confrontation Clause in absence of necessity or defendant’s consent
holding that deprivation of right to counsel may amount to structural defect
stating that a defendant’s involuntary absence from 2 trial during crucial testimony might constitute structural error
defendant preserved ground in one sentence during lengthy hearing and without citation to any case law or any argument as to prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minzner, Hartz, Pickard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.