State v. Rodrigues

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellate court may review sufficiency of the evidence for plain error even though defendant did not move for judgment of acquittal after all the parties had rested
• the defendant lost his right to contest the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, made at the conclusion of the prosecution’s case-in- chief, by introducing evidence after the motion was denied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lacallo
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-06-19· cited 117×
• State v. Mitsuda
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1997-09-02· cited 34×
• State v. Pudiquet
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1996-07-30· cited 20×
• State v. Calaycay.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2019-08-26· cited 14×
• State v. Yamashiro
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1991-08-14· cited 13×
• State v. Elliston
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-07-18
• State v. Westbrook
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-05-28

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Halemanu
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1982-08-31· cited 38×