Skip to main content

State v. Rodrigues

Citations

  • 692 P.2d 1156
  • 67 Haw. 496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prosecution waived the issues of “good faith” and “exigent circumstances” exceptions to the exclusionary rule because it failed to raise the issue at trial
  • holding that the prosecution waived the issues of \good faith\ and \exigent circumstances\ exceptions to the exclusionary rule because it failed to raise the issue at trial
  • noting that, because the prosecution offered only one theory, this court would not review new, alternative theories on appeal
  • noting that, because the prosecution offered only one theory, this court would not review new, alternative theories on appeal
  • noting that, because the prosecution offered only one theory, this court would not review new, alternative theories on appeal
  • noting that, because the prosecution offered only one theory, this court would not review new, alternative theories on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.