Skip to main content
· 1/24/2020

State v. Rodolfo Morales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the debtor restarted the limitations period when she wrote, “I can only promise to pay the $1,600 with interest in some future time.”
  • “[A]n acknowledgment made after 6 the statute has run gives a new cause of action, for which the old debt is consideration.”
  • the statement, “I can only promise 13 to pay the $1,600 with interest in some future time. You will never lose through me,” was 14 sufficient
  • letters admitting sum certain to be paid \in some future time\ was definite, distinct, and positive recognition of debt with implied promise to pay by principal of corporation to which the loan/investment was made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.