Missouri Court of Appeals· 5/15/1984
State v. Roden
Citations
- 674 S.W.2d 50
- 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 4707
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence that a defendant intended to have sexual intercourse by forcible compulsion was deemed a threat to rape the victim, and not an attempt to solicit the victim to engage in sexual intercourse
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Somerville, Clark, Berrey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Phelps v. BrossMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-02-05· cited 33×
- State v. MolkenburMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-01-21· cited 10×
- State v. HoardMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-08-29· cited 9×
- State v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-09-01· cited 9×
- State v. CoronaMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-01-11· cited 6×
- State of Missouri v. Carl E. EmersonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2019-04-02· cited 4×
- State v. WareMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-08-21· cited 4×
- State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-11-05· cited 3×
- State v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-10-20· cited 3×
- State v. SigmonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-04-25· cited 3×
- State v. ShipmanMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-09-30· cited 2×
- State v. TruittMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-12-30· cited 1×
- State v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-08-20· cited 1×
- State v. DuckettMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-01-21
- Roden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-04-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.