State v. Rockey
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4101
Syllabus
Appellant asserts that the record does not support the trial court's consecutive service findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The trial court was statutorily required to impose consecutive sentences for the felonious assault count, the repeat violent offender specification, and the failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer count. As to the obstructing official business count, appellant has not established by clear and convincing evidence that the record does not support the trial court's findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurring.)
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.