Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/15/2018

State v. Rock

Citations

2018 Ohio 4175

Syllabus

CRIMINAL LAW - Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest after the imposition of sentence Crim.R. 32.1 motions are subject to the doctrine of res judicata de novo ineffective assistance withholding exculpatory evidence arguments could have been raised in direct appeal issues barred by res judicata trial court not required to hold an evidentiary hearing.

Judges: Cannon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. James
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-02· cited 8×
State v. Cain
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-28· cited 8×
State v. Rock
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-08· cited 3×
State v. Burton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-04· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
State v. Rock
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-09· cited 9×
State v. Rock
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-30· cited 8×
State v. Rock
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-21· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.