State v. Robertson
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 7225
Syllabus
NEW TRIAL-NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence: the newly discovered evidence did more than merely impeach or contradict the evidence presented at trial and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the newly discovered evidence disclosed a strong probability that it would change the result if a new trial was granted. The trial court abused its discretion in ordering a new trial on charges remotely related to the newly discovered evidence: the evidence presented at trial overwhelmingly tied the defendant to those crimes therefore, the newly discovered evidence did not disclose a strong probability of a different outcome if a new trial on those charges was granted.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1975-07-09· cited 118×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.