State v. RKC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he hypothetical questions posed by the state used facts that properly were in evidence, did not specifically reference the victim and did not elicit from [the expert] a statement as to the victim’s credibility”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. FAVOCCIA
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-01-19· cited 11×
• State v. LW
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-07-06· cited 10×
• State v. L.W.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-07-06· cited 8×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DeJesus
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-08-19· cited 196×
• State v. Spigarolo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-14· cited 159×
• State v. Troupe
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-11· cited 159×
• Christiano v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 61×
• State v. Christiano
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-02-08· cited 57×
• State v. Grenier
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-09-04· cited 52×
• Town of West Hartford v. MURTHA CULLINA
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-09-14· cited 23×
• State v. John G.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-04-10· cited 21×
• State v. Keiser
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-30· cited 21×
• State v. Raynor
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-31· cited 16×
• State v. Mitchell
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-16· cited 9×
• State v. Ramirez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-22· cited 8×
• State v. R.K.C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-07· cited 4×