Skip to main content

State v. Rivers

Citations

  • 981 P.2d 16
  • 96 Wash. App. 672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring a docketing statement 2 1 to contain “a concise, accurate statement of the case summarizing all facts material to 2 a consideration of the issues presented”
  • \counsel is entitled to `comment on a witness's veracity or invite the jury to make reasonable inferences from the evidence so long as counsel does not express a personal opinion.'\
  • The prosecutor referred to the defendant and his associates as predators, hyenas, and jackals.
  • “counsel is entitled to ‘comment on a witness’s veracity or invite the jury to make reasonable inferences from the evidence so long as counsel does not express a personal opinion.’ ” (quoting State v. Stover, 67 Wn. App. 228, 232, 834 P.2d 671 (1992
  • “counsel is entitled to ‘comment on a witness’s veracity or invite the jury to make reasonable inferences from the evidence so long as counsel does not express a personal opinion.’ ” (quoting State v. Stover, 67 Wn. App. 228, 232, 834 P.2d 671 (1992), review denied, 120 Wn.2d 1025 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Cox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.