State v. Risaburo
Citations
- 61 Wash. 162
- 112 P. 85
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1304
Syllabus
<p>Dewdness — Living with Prostitute — Sex of Accused — Evidence —Sufficiency. In a prosecution of a male person for living with and accepting the earnings of a prostitute, the objection that there was no evidence that he was a male person is without merit, where he appeared before the jury, responded to masculine pronouns addressed to him, and his sex was not made an issue. .</p> <p>Same — Accepting Earnings — Evidence—Sufficiency. A conviction of living with and accepting the earnings of a prostitute, is supported by evidence of confessions and admissions, and the fact that the accused had lived for years with the same prostitute without other visible means of support.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that a trial court erred in “dismissing [the] action with prejudice for the nonmerits issue of lack of jurisdiction[,]” and remanding the matter to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the action without prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.