Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/13/1882
State v. Ring
Citations
- 29 Minn. 78
- 11 N.W. 233
- 1882 Minn. LEXIS 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding district court’s exclusion of prospective juror who did not have “knowledge of the [English] language as to enable him to understand the evidence, the argument of counsel, and the instructions of the court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dickinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MeanySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-05-18· cited 36×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-01-22· cited 30×
- Board of Commissioners v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court· 1890-04-25· cited 20×
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-02-03· cited 18×
- State v. BerriosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-08-24· cited 17×
- Mills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1932-11-07· cited 10×
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of Missouri· 1919-06-03· cited 7×
- State v. CzizekSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1888-02-10· cited 4×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.