State v. Riley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when statutory terms are unambiguous, “we may not rewrite them by judicial construction”
• holding that go-peds are motor vehicles
• answering in the affirmative a certified question from the county court regarding whether a go-ped is a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Florida Statutes and requires a license for its operation
• two-wheeled scooter with gasoline powered engine was \motor vehicle\ requiring valid driver's license for its operation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Soto v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-20· cited 10×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-09· cited 5×
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 2003-09-25
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 2002-07-08
• Hinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-27
• Dummett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-14
• A.C., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-04-09

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bamber
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-20· cited 52×
• State v. Bamber
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-20· cited 13×
• Kelder v. Act Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-03· cited 6×