State v. Riddick
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 1117
Syllabus
Breaking and entering R.C. 2911.13(B) sufficiency of the evidence manifest weight of the evidence Evid.R. 404(B) other acts common scheme or plan. Defendant's conviction for breaking and entering was supported by sufficient evidence. The state presented circumstantial evidence that the defendant trespassed on the victim's property, and it was reasonable to infer from the evidence presented that defendant trespassed with the purpose to commit theft. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of other acts in order to show the defendant had a common scheme or plan. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to give a limiting instruction.
Judges: Headen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 417×
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-17· cited 50×
- State v. RoseberryOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-17· cited 50×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-06· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.