Skip to main content
· 5/18/1995

State v. Rickard-Hughes

Citations

  • 895 P.2d 1036
  • 182 Ariz. 273
  • 190 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 20
  • 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an indictment is sufficient if it “protects the defendant from subsequent prosecution for the same offense”
  • “Rule 16.6(b) is not the proper procedural means for a dismissal when the trial judge believes the evidence against the defendant is insufficient to go to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Kleinschmidt, Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.