Skip to main content

State v. Richmond

Citations

  • 21 Kan. App. 2d 126
  • 896 P.2d 1112
  • 1995 Kan. App. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the State was not bound by the terms of the plea agreement after the defendant violated the terms of his suspended sentence, broke the law by possessing cocaine, and failed to pay his fines as stated in the plea agreement
  • finding change in circumstances sufficient to relieve the State of its duty to adhere to the plea agreement upon revocation of the suspended sentence
  • State not bound by sentencing recommendation in plea agreement when defendant later breaks the law
  • State not held to the terms of the plea agreement after the defendant violated the terms of his suspended sentence, broke the law by possessing cocaine, and failed to pay his fines as stated in the plea agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brazil, Larson, Love

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.