Court of Appeals of Kansas· 6/9/1995
State v. Richmond
Citations
- 21 Kan. App. 2d 126
- 896 P.2d 1112
- 1995 Kan. App. LEXIS 91
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the State was not bound by the terms of the plea agreement after the defendant violated the terms of his suspended sentence, broke the law by possessing cocaine, and failed to pay his fines as stated in the plea agreement
- finding change in circumstances sufficient to relieve the State of its duty to adhere to the plea agreement upon revocation of the suspended sentence
- State not bound by sentencing recommendation in plea agreement when defendant later breaks the law
- State not held to the terms of the plea agreement after the defendant violated the terms of his suspended sentence, broke the law by possessing cocaine, and failed to pay his fines as stated in the plea agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brazil, Larson, Love
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-02-27· cited 104×
- State v. WillsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-12-09· cited 57×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-05-28· cited 56×
- State v. RoyseSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-01-22· cited 45×
- State v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-07-10· cited 40×
- State v. RatleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-07-09· cited 24×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-01-27· cited 15×
- State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-06-17· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.