State v. Richmond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that preventing “a conviction based on prejudice created by evidence of other crimes is the underlying purpose” for excluding other-crimes evidence
• determining that unintentional elicitation of past crimes was not prejudicial in light of other, strong evidence of defendant’s guilt
• “attach[ing] importance to whether . . . 13 prosecutor intentionally elicited such testimony” when determining whether to reverse based on witness testimony that prejudiced defendant’s case
• court in assessing prejudice attaches some importance to whether the prosecutor intentionally elicited the reference
• “In cases involving the erroneous admission of [evidence permitting the jury to infer that defendant had a prior record], this court has attached importance to whether the prosecutor intentionally elicited such testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Haglund
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-06-16· cited 34×
• State v. Hagen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-01-22· cited 25×
• State v. McNeil
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-04-01· cited 17×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-02-06· cited 17×
• State v. Holbrook
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-09-19· cited 7×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-11-03· cited 3×
• State of Minnesota v. Cody Logan Fohrenkam
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-05-28

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kirby v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
• State v. Madison
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-08-09· cited 19×
• State v. Tinklenberg
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-02-11· cited 17×
• State v. Barness
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-08-04· cited 3×