Skip to main content

State v. Richmond

Citations

  • 827 P.2d 743
  • 250 Kan. 375
  • 1992 Kan. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Dorsey, holding two counts of rape not multiplicitous despite time frame similar to that in Dorsey
  • distinguishing Dorsey, holding two counts of rape not multiplicitous despite time frame similar to that in Dorsey
  • distinguishing Dorsey, holding two counts of rape not multiplicitous despite time frame similar to that in Dorsey
  • describing Buggs as ‘[t]he leading case on what is required to be proven to establish the facilitation of the commission of any crime provision of K.S.A. 21-3420[b]’
  • describing Buggs as “[t]he leading case on what is required to be proven to establish the facilitation of the commission of any crime provision of K.S.A. 21-3420[b]”
  • affirming defendant’s two rape convictions as not multiplicitous where victim was raped, then tied up while defendant left the room, and then untied and raped again all within a one-hour time span

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.