Skip to main content

State v. Richardson

Citations

  • 927 N.E.2d 379
  • 2010 Ind. LEXIS 380
  • 2010 WL 2210910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating the Act “could be read to prohibit a police officer making a seat belt stop from even asking the driver for consent to search the vehicle”
  • stating the Act “could be read to prohibit a police officer making a seat belt stop from even asking the driver for consent to search the vehicle”
  • stating the Act “sought to circumscribe the power of police to use a seat belt stop as an opportunity to inspect, search, or detain on other grounds, even if constitutional law would permit such police behavior”
  • stating the Act “sought to circumscribe the power of police to use a seat belt stop as an opportunity to inspect, search, or detain on other grounds, even if constitutional law would permit such police behavior”
  • officer describing a “very large, unusual bulge” in defendant’s pocket
  • officer describing a “very large, unusual bulge” in defendant’s pocket

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.