State v. Richardson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]here is no such sacredness attached to personal property as can justify, in its defence, resistance to an authorized officer of the law, acting in good faith, under lawful process”
• conviction for assaulting and resisting an officer serving a writ of attachment
• resisting an officer serving a writ of attachment
• resisting an officer serving a writ of attachment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Busch v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-03-13· cited 44×
• Cover v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-26· cited 35×
• Titus v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-11-29· cited 23×
• State v. Haas
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-07-26· cited 12×
• State v. Davidson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-04-10· cited 11×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Merritt v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1841-02-15· cited 8×
• State v. Buchanan
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1845-03-15· cited 4×